From: SMTP%"klein@adage.Berkeley.EDU" 14-MAR-1996 15:39:53.45 To: STAPP CC: Subj: Re: Reply to Hayes 5 Date: Thu, 14 Mar 96 15:34:15 PST From: klein@adage.Berkeley.EDU (Stanley Klein) Message-Id: <9603142334.AA07894@adage.Berkeley.EDU> To: ghrosenb@phil.indiana.edu, klein@adage.Berkeley.EDU Subject: Re: Reply to Hayes 5 Cc: A.Sloman@cs.bham.ac.uk, STAPP@theorm.lbl.gov, brings@rpi.edu, keith@imprint.co.uk, mckee@neosoft.com, patrickw@cs.monash.edu.au, phayes@cs.uiuc.edu Thanks Gregg for your clarifications. You are quite possibly correct on all points. I suspect that the best way to proceed on this issue (the hard question - or the identity question) is to wait for Chalmer's book and use that as a framework. Does that make sense. Let me ask a different question. Do you think that scientists can work fruitfully on the easy questions (figuring out the NCCQ) without having to worry about the hard one (why does blue have the feel it does). Stan